🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what average American pays. I know dozens of clients who are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to many our government's military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for small businesses which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.